Mitral Valve RepairThe
history of mitral valve repair is quite interesting. Dr. Alain Carpentier
began developing the techniques of mitral valve repair in Paris in the early
1970's.
Below is a picture of me with Dr. Carpentier (next to me).
Behind us is Dr. Charles Benoit, the Chief at the Geisinger Medical
Center in Danville, Pennsylvania.

There were two reasons Professor Carpentier developed these
techniques.
First, the early results of mitral valve replacement with
prosthetic valves was poor. Unfortunately, surgeons didn't fully
understand the anatomy of the mitral valve at that time, especially the
importance of the so-called sub-valvular apparatus
(the papillary muscle and the attachments holding the mitral
leaflets).
As a result, when surgeons placed prosthetic valves in the early
days of heart surgery, they often used to cut out the leaflets and their
attachments. This changed the geometry of the pumping chamber of
the heart and resulted in a weakened heart muscle. Many of these
patients died of heart failure after their valves were successfully
replaced.
In addition, the use of blood thinners was not as standardized as
it is today. Patients had many complications such as clotting of
the prosthetic valves, stokes, and so on.
Second, Professor Carpentier began treating many poor patients
from throughout Europe and Africa who suffered from Rheumatic heart
disease and who would most certainly be non-compliant in taking their
medications once they returned home. Therefore, regulating blood
thinners in these patients was simply out of the question. By
repairing their valves, these patients would not need blood thinners and
would more likely survive with little medical follow-up.
Mitral valve repair, therefore is
physiologically better than mitral valve replacement. As a result,
we try to repair the mitral valve whenever possible.
Is mitral valve replacement bad?
No. As a follow-up to the development of mitral valve
repair, an interesting parallel history occurred with mitral valve
replacement with prosthetic valves: Surgeons better understood the
anatomy of the mitral valve and began preserving the sub-valvular
structures when mitral valve was replaced. Consequently, the
results improved. Also, blood thinning therapy has also become
standardized. Therefore, patients now do exceptionally well with
prosthetic mitral valves.
So, is it better to repair or replace the
mitral valve? Even though mitral valve
replacement with a prosthetic valve is now completely safe, it is still
always preferable to have the valve repaired if possible.
The reasons still remain the same. A repaired valve is
physiologically closer to normal and the patient can avoid blood
thinners. Though blood thinners are generally safe, they do have
about a 2% yearly risk of complications. Plus, if you are on blood
thinners, you have to have your blood level checked regularly.
But, mitral valve repair can be a complex procedure. Not
every mitral valve can be repaired and not every repair works.
So, if you end up with a mitral valve replacement, it may be just
what you need. You should not look upon this as a failure.
In my hands, approximately 90% of patients with mitral valve
insufficiency will receive a repair. However, every patient and
every valve is different. I prepare every patient for the
possibility of needing a replacement valve even though I am going into
the operation planning on repairing their valve.
I have had the privilege of taking multiple courses on mitral
valve repair both in the United States and in Paris. I've watched
many of the true pioneers: Dr. Alain Carpentier, Dr. Carlos Duran,
Dr. Delos Cosgrove, and Dr. Christophe Acar.

Dr. Carpentier |

Dr. Acar, Dr. Singer (me), and Dr. Duran |
Mitral valve repair remains one of the most
interesting and challenging open heart operations that we perform.
CLICK HERE and see an
interesting case - an example of Mitral Valve Repair!